Advertisement

Rotational alignment of the knee is different in osteological specimens with and without a large cam deformity of the proximal femur

Rotational alignment of the knee is different in osteological specimens with and without a large cam deformity of the proximal femur

Post author correction

Article Type: ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Article Subject: Biomechanics

DOI:10.5301/hipint.5000475

Authors

Jeremy J. Gebhart, Jonathan J. Streit, Avi Goodman, Jordan Etscheidt, Douglas S. Weinberg, Asheesh Bedi, Shane J. Nho, Michael J. Salata

Abstract

Purpose

We studied a large osteological collection for differences in knee rotation based upon the presence or absence of a large cam deformity of the proximal femur.

Methods

We obtained 357 matched tibiae and femora from the Hamann-Todd Osteological Collection and measured: femoral head-neck alpha angle, anteroposterior axis (or Whiteside’s line) at the distal femur relative to the posterior condylar axis, and position of the tibial tubercle with respect to the posterior condylar axis of the proximal tibia. We then divided these specimens into two groups based upon alpha angle <45° (Group 1, n = 73) or alpha angle >60° (Group 2, n = 122) and performed an independent samples t-test to evaluate for differences in measured parameters between groups using this subset of specimens.

Results

The mean alpha angles in Group 1 and 2 were 40.9° ± 3.3° and 67.0° ± 5.6°, respectively. Whiteside’s line was externally rotated with respect to the posterior femoral condylar axis by a mean of 1.8° ± 6.8° in Group 1, vs. 3.0° ± 3.7° in Group 2 (p = 0.03). The tibial tubercle was externally rotated by a mean of 19.4° ± 6.8° in Group 1, versus 16.6° ± 5.1° in Group 2 (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Specimens with femoral head-neck alpha angle >60° demonstrated greater external rotation of the distal femur and a more internally-rotated tibial tubercle compared to specimens with an alpha angle <45°. Differences in anatomic characteristics of the knee may play a role in the development of patellofemoral pain in patients with a large cam deformity.

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: None.
Conflict of interest: None.

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36,00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

Affiliations

  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio - USA
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island - USA
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan - USA
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois - USA

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.