Advertisement

Gait metric profile and gender differences in hip osteoarthritis patients. A case-controlled study

Gait metric profile and gender differences in hip osteoarthritis patients. A case-controlled study

Hip Int 2014; 24(3): 270 - 276

Article Type: ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Article Subject: Biomechanics

DOI:10.5301/hipint.5000111

Authors

Morsi Khashan, Amit Mor, Yiftah Beer, Ehud Rath, David R. Morgensteren, Ronen Debi, Avi Elbaz

Corresponding author

  • Avi Elbaz
  • AposTherapy Research Group
  • 1 Abba Even Blvd
  • Herzliya, 46733
  • researchdept10@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose: Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a slowly progressive destructive disease that results in alterations in joint loads and biomechanics to which patients adapt compensatory alterations and abnormal gait patterns. This prospective cross-sectional, case-controlled study examined these alterations in gait metrics and evaluated gender differences in gait spatiotemporal parameters. Correlations between function and gait metrics were also investigated.

Basic Procedures: Hip OA patients (138 females and 122 males) and healthy controls (14 females and 26 males) matched for age and gender underwent the same investigative protocol consisting of a spatiotemporal gait analysis followed by functional evaluations using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36).

Main Findings: Differences between the patient and the control groups were significant in all the spatiotemporal parameters. There were significant gender differences within the hip OA group in all parameters except for cadence and single limb support percentage. WOMAC and SF-36 scores revealed significant differences between the study and control groups in most components. Significantly higher scores in the three components of the WOMAC as well as in six SF-36 score components were found among males compared to females in the patient group.

Principal Conclusions: Gait, WOMAC and SF-36 were effective objective and subjective tools for evaluating a large cohort of patients with hip OA, and can be highly useful for supplementing the assessment of hip OA severity and enhancing treatment efficacy during the course of the disease.

Article History

Disclosures

Financial Support: None.
Conflict of Interest: None.

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36.00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

Affiliations

  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre, Tel-Aviv, Israel, affiliated to the Sacker Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv - Israel
  • AposTherapy Research Group, Herzliya - Israel
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Assaf Harofeh Medical Centre, Zerifin - Israel
  • The Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Unit, Orthopaedic Department, Hadassah Medical Centre, Jerusalem - Israel
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Barzilay Medical Centre, Ashkelon - Israel

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.